Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rod Adams's avatar

Where is the evidence that it is anymore difficult for the Navy to arrange port calls for nuclear powered vessels than for any other Navy vessel?

For aircraft carriers, the real challenge is the size of the ship and crew. It's a real logistical challenge that is quite different from that of bringing a large cruise ship with a similar passenger count into port.

Submarines have smaller crews, but they are still deep draft vessels that cannot enter many ports because the channel depth isn't sufficient.

My sense is that many of the most commercially interesting ports are not going to have any real difficulty allowing nuclear ships to enter - as long as there is some kind of payment system that would make up for the income ports obtain from selling fuel to visiting ships.

Propulsion plants using passive safety and achieving EPZs that are limited to the ship will also be helpful.

Neural Foundry's avatar

Excellent roundup of the fuel fabrication milestones. The TX-1 facility progress alongside Standard's capacity expansion is exaclty what the supply chain needs to hit those July deadlines. I've been tracking HALEU production constraints for awhile and it's wild to see 2+ metric tons/year becoming realistic - thats the kind of throughput that actually enables multiple reactor deployments simultaneously instead of everything bottlenecking on fuel availability.

No posts

Ready for more?